Re: libgit2 - a true git library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:

On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 12:41:22AM +0000, david@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:

Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


I.e. use the supplied custom function to do proprietary magic, such as
reading the object lazily from elsewhere over the network.  And we will
never get that magic bit back.

As a maintainer I'd never accept such a patch.  I'd ask for the
code under read_object_custom, or toss the patch on the floor.
But that doesn't stop them from distributing the patched sources
like above, keeping the fun bits in the closed source portion of
the executable they distribute.

Maybe I just think too highly of the other guy, but I'd hope that
anyone patching libgit2 like above would try to avoid it, because
they'd face merge issues in the future.

the issue that I see is that libgit2 will be (on most systems) a shared
library.

what's to stop someone from taking the libgit2 code, adding the magic
proprietary piece, and selling a new libgit2 library binary 'just replace
your existing shared library with this new one and all your git related
programs gain this feature'

Its license. GPL even with GCC exception would not allow you to do that.
Though they could propose a fork of the library patched, with the patch
distributed. The downside would be that their code would not be binary
compatible with the "true" libgit2, so they would probably have to
change the name to avoid namespace clashes, or overwrite the "real"
library.

the proposal had been for the library to be BSD, not GPL. and I don't see any reason why such a thing couldn't be done with a BSE library.

David Lang

But yes, it's theoretically feasible. I'm not sure it would be worth the
hassle, and if they respect the license (if they don't they can already
do that with the current git anyway) then the fact that someone would
want to do something like that would be known fact, probably not
avoided, but known.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux