Re: libgit2 - a true git library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 31 okt 2008, at 22:31, Pierre Habouzit wrote:

Git is currently mostly "GPLv2 or later". A BSDish license was
mentioned, because it's the most permissive one and that nobody cared
that much, though a LGPL/GPL-with-GCC-exception would probably fly.

Many of the people needing a library for libgit are probably reading the
list, I'll let them comment

As an implementor of a git GUI, I don't really care what license
libgit2 will be. GitX is currently GPLv2, though that might change
to LGPL to allow it to ship/link with non-GPL libraries. GPL and LGPL
would both suit me.

As a more concrete comment, is there anything you would like to hear
from GUI developers during the development of libgit2? I'm not sure I
can contribute much in terms of code, but if you need any constructive
comments, I can help with that.

- Pieter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux