David Symonds <dsymonds <at> gmail.com> writes: > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:58 AM, 7rans <transfire <at> gmail.com> wrote: > > > Currently I achieve this by adding "[type]" to the end of my commit messages. > > But of course that's less than optimal. > > Why is that less than optimal? It seems a lot less intrusive than what > you suggest. Because it becomes formalized. Which means people can write tools other people can use to work with them. Having the type embedded in commit message not only clutters up the commit messages, but different people would do it differently, using different brackets or putting it the start or the end of the message, etc. And of course it would be easier to ask git to list certain types of commits if it knew about them. 7rans. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
