Re: [PATCH] Use find instead of perl in t5000 to get file modification time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sam Vilain, Thu, Oct 30, 2008 06:29:14 +0100:
> On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 11:38 +0100, Alex Riesen wrote:
> > I could not find what exactly does the ActiveState's Perl use for its stat
> > implementation (and honestly, have no motivation to look harder).
> > It seems to honor TZ, but the produced time does not seem to be either
> > local or GMT.
> 
> See, the difference is that the perl is portable and your patch isn't.

ActiveState Perl on Windows is portable? To another windows, maybe.

> Can you at least reveal how far out the value printed by the perl
> fragment was from the expected value, and what your TZ offset is in
> seconds.  It might be pointing to a deeper problem that could affect
> more than just this test case.

I tried TZ set to CET (my zone), GMT, and UTC. The difference was from
1200 sec to 3600.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux