Re: Using the --track option when creating a branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 13:25 +0100, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> >> Ok, now I'm confused.  The ONLY thing I want to prevent is the
> >> "crossing of streams" issue.  If I am on branch X and issue 'git
> >> push', I want X, and ONLY X, to be pushed to the remote repository's X
> >> branch --- I don't care if other branches are pushed to their
> >> respective remote branches, as long as they don't get merged to X.
> This particular bikeshed was painted a long time ago, with the consensus
> going in favour of "git push" pushing all *matching* refspecs.

I realise that - I just found it interesting that there was a user who
explicitly expected this not to be the case.

Which I think is reasonable, because it's what 'git pull' does.  I
myself have encountered many people who did not like the current default
behaviour.  I think far from "bikeshedding" this is quite an important
part of the ui experience.

Sam.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux