Alex Riesen, Tue, Oct 28, 2008 13:47:21 +0100: > 2008/10/28 Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>: > > Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Maybe I should resend the patches without it, following by patches > >> introducing git_snpath and replacing calls to git_path. > > > > I took the liberty of doing the first half of just that ;-) > > > > Thanks. And am sorry... I did that too, and stupidly forgot to send. > I also considered replacing xstrdup(mkpath) with a function which does > just that (patches 8-9). Patches 1 and 2 are unrelated, will send them > separately. > > FWIW now, I'm sending the patches. Err... The builtin-revert.c hunk of path 0009 depends on the patch I sent later: "Plug a memleak in builtin-revert". The patch removed const in front of "char *defmsg". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
