Re: [VOTE] git versus mercurial (for DragonflyBSD)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jakub Narebski wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> Also, looking at git, git users still have to garbage collect regularly, which 
>> shows to me that the design wasn't really cleaner. 
> 
> Well, they have to a lot less than they used to, and there is 
> "git gc --auto" that can be put in crontab safely.

I think you missed the most convincing argument _for_ explicit garbage collection.

By allowing explicit repository packing, git allows you to delay a cpu intensive
operation til later, when time doesn't matter, like at the end of the day right
before I go home. It also allows more cpu intensive delta/compression algorithms
to be used.

By contrast, mercurial performs deltafication and compression on each commit.
So, acceptable commit speed must be weighed against the complexity of the
deltafication/compression algorithm and file format.

-brandon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux