Re: [VOTE] git versus mercurial (for DragonflyBSD)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26 Oct 2008 15:15:57 +0100, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 1. Documentation and ease of use.
>
>    Mercurial is supposedly better documented and easier to use; I
>    think this descends from the early days of Git, where it was not
>    very user friendly. IMHO Git has much improved since.  Mercurial
>    had 'hgbook' from the beginning; Git User's Manual is more recent.

Also, there is http://book.git-scm.com/ that is similar to hgbook, I think.

Thanks for the comprarision!

-- 
 .  Hoc est simplicissimum!
..: maxim.vuets.name
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux