On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 04:01:59PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote: > Your reasoning makes sense, of course. (I thought that forgoing textconv > in these cases would have a simpler implementation; but it can't be a lot > simpler than yours.) Yeah, I think preventing it entirely for this case would be much more complex, since you would have to realize much sooner that a textconv was going to happen. > > +test_expect_failure 'textconv does not act on symlinks' ' > Can we trust your solution if you still have 'test_expect_failure' here? ;-) Heh. It helps if I commit before format-patch. ;) Fortunately, this was the only change I missed out on sending. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
