Re: linux-next: stackprotector tree build failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:27:25 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think rerere matches preimages on the SHA1 of the conflict (or its
> reverse), so sufficiently similar pieces of code will match.  I would
> expect things like ext2/3/4 to be candidates.  Did the traps_32.c one
> match one for traps_64.c?

Or, of course similar conflicts in different merges in different branches
of the same tree are really asking for it ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgpaXglOJBkjQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux