Junio C Hamano schrieb: > René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> I think it makes sense to make 1, or even 3, the default for this >> option for all commands that create patches intended for human >> consumption. The patch keeps the default at 0, though. > > I think defaulting to 1 would make sense, or alternatively, just > hardcoding that behaviour without any new option. That would give you > more information with the same number of patch lines, iow, upside without > any downside. Are you sure about the "without any downside" part? The extra context line inhibits that the patch applies cleanly to a version of the file that has that very line modified (including a different number of lines). -- Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
