Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 03:47:04PM +0200, Maciej Pasternacki wrote: > >> As for -C being superfluous: --git-dir and --work-tree seem to support >> weird usage patterns (like work tree separate from git-dir), but it seems > > Hmm. Yeah, thinking about it more, -C is not really superfluous with > respect to those options. You don't want to say "here is the work-tree, > and here is the git-dir". You want to say "find the work-tree and > git-dir for me using the usual rules, as if I were in this directory." I think that interpretation of -C, if the option existed, makes sense, but I do not understand why the tool that drives git refuses to chdir to the repository for itself in the first place. The only excuse I remember seeing in the thread was that "make has '-C' option, so let's have it, because it is similar", which does not justfiy addition of that option to git at all to me. With "make", the -C option can be justified as a necessary tool to write a recursive Makefile that can be sanely and easily processed without actually executing any commands (iow, imaging implementing "make" that allows you to write "cd there && $(MAKE)" in the toplevel Makefile and tells the users what would happen in "there" when run as "make -n"). And even in "make" context, not all implementations have it. I think it is only GNU and fairly recent BSDs. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
