Jan Hudec wrote:
As for people replacing their local commits, this is common especially in Linux (and Git) development model.
It's common everywhere where projects use peer review. Results 1 - 50 of about 14,600 for '"PATCH v2" vger.kernel.org' Results 1 - 50 of about 360,000 for "PATCH v2" So yes, it is a very common practice and anything interacting with a remote database based on each commit action will almost certainly be doing something wrong quite a lot of the time, especially since not all the patch-series end up being incorporated into a release anyway. The only sane integration point is the public watering-hole repository used for the project, and especially the release branch (or the "for-linus" branches around the world for sub-projects). -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
