Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:17:20PM +0100, Rick Moynihan <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have a master branch, a dev branch and a number of feature branches from
dev. And I was wondering if there was an easy way to rebase dev and all of
it's sub-branches onto master.
In general this is considered harmful. Why do you rebase your branch
from time to time? For example in git.git, topic branches are based on
master, then merged to master when they are ready, but they are never
rebased.
Yes, but my understanding is that it's only harmful if you publish the
branch (or dependent branches) which are being rebased.
So rebasing is very bad in these circumstances, but I fail to see why
it's bad if these branches are kept private.
R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
