Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > - all the editors that this guy tested keep the hard links, so it was > kinda hard to understand why Git insists on behaving differently, > > - if the user asked for hard links, it is not Git's place to question that > decision, These are non-arguments, when you are asked to give rationale for adding capability to "ask for hard links" to begin with. IOW, the question was why git should support tracked contents being hardlinked to something else. [jc: Sorry for dropping Shawn from CC: list. pobox.com seems to complain on his address for some reason. Here are msmtp log for an identical message with and without him on the recipient list. Oct 13 10:23:57 host=sasl.smtp.pobox.com tls=on auth=on user=junio@xxxxxxxxx from=junio@xxxxxxxxx recipients=Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx,barkalow@xxxxxxxxxxxx,git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx,gitster@xxxxxxxxx smtpstatus=451 smtpmsg='451 4.3.5 Server configuration problem' errormsg='recipient address spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx not accepted by the server' exitcode=EX_DATAERR Oct 13 10:31:26 host=sasl.smtp.pobox.com tls=on auth=on user=junio@xxxxxxxxx from=junio@xxxxxxxxx recipients=Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx,barkalow@xxxxxxxxxxxx,git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,gitster@xxxxxxxxx mailsize=2283 exitcode=EX_OK ] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
