Re: tip tree clone fail

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Soapbox: in fact it would be outright stupid to limit the kernel 
> > source's availability artificially by not making HTTP a tier-one access 
> > method.
> 
> Hopefully there should soon be here "smart" HTTP server [...]
> 
> It is WIP, but I'm not sure how far it is from completion.

Its still not even prototyped.  I'm supposed to be spending my 20%
time at Google on the Git-in-HTTP documentation and implementation,
so I can feed patches to the list for review.

Sadly, my current 80% project has been demanding >120% of my time
these past 5 weeks, so I have not been able to touch the Git-in-HTTP
concept in that time period.

Most of my 80% project has to be wrapped up by this time next
week.  Afterwards I'm going to try and dedicate at least a week
to Git-in-HTTP and get caught up.  I sort of have to; its part of
my goals for my performance evaluation.  Even if the list winds
up rejecting my implementation, I still have to put it out there
for discussion.

-- 
Shawn.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux