Re: [PATCH maint] builtin-merge.c: fix memory under-allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brandon Casey <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Brandon Casey <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >> I didn't mean to imply that the memory under-allocation
> >> was caused by a change in variable type in this case. Re-reading my commit
> >> message, maybe it sounds like that.
> > 
> > Yeah, it does.  I was scratching my head and had to read the patch three
> > times until I got it (yes, I am especially slower than usual today, as the
> > reason I am reading mails right now is because I am jetlagged and cannot
> > sleep).
> 
> If it's not too late, maybe this would make a better commit message:

Nope, I didn't get around to the patch until now.  Better message
is being used...  ;-)

Thanks everyone.
 
> --->8---
> builtin-merge.c: allocate correct amount of memory
> 
> Fix two memory allocation errors which allocate space for a pointer rather
> than enough space for the structure itself.
> 
> This:
> 
>     struct commit_list *parent = xmalloc(sizeof(struct commit_list *));
> 
> should have been this:
> 
>     struct commit_list *parent = xmalloc(sizeof(struct commit_list));
>     
> But while we're at it, change the allocation to reference the variable it is
> allocating memory for to try to prevent a similar mistake, for example if the
> type is changed, in the future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Shawn.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux