On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 12:47:16PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > It is not a bug. > > If it's unwanted functionality, that's a bug. That's kind of the whole > (and only) difference between "bug" and "feature". Do people want it? It looks like you have changed your opinion since what you wrote half a year ago. Back then you said: > Yeah. Why not just rather than the whole ok/cancel discussion, go with a > single button saying "good for me!" and be done with it. > > IOW, the license thing should be considered *informational* rather than a > choice. Because to a user, that's exactly what the GPL is. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.msysgit/1677 Also, please, re-read what Junio said in this thread: "I think removing the license dialog is a bad idea. You need to tell the end-user about his rights, and one of the things is that he can get source to git under the terms of GPLv2. The bug is not about showing the license, but is about refusing to install unless the end user agrees with it." I think such a step as removing the license should be approved by Junio and not be taken behind his back as it's happening now. Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
