Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: > On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 3:31 AM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >> >>> This makes it possible to use an URL such as >>> $project/somebranch..otherbranch:/filename to get a diff between >>> different version of a file. Paths like >>> $project/$action/somebranch:/somefile..otherbranch:/otherfile are parsed >>> as well. >>> >> >> In short, it allows to have link to '*diff' views using path_info URL, >> or in general to pass $hash_[parent_]base and $file_parent using >> path_info. > > Yes, that's probably a better form for the commit message. I have thought about this rather as supplement (addition) to the current commit message (which states explicitly new form of supported path_info URL), than replacing it. >> The following path_info layouts with '..' make sense: >> >> hpb:fp..hb:f >> hpb..hb:f == hpb:f..hb:f >> hp..h > > And these are matched by the above regexp > >> And the layout below can be though to make sense, but it is just >> plain weird. >> >> hpb:fp..f == hpb:fp..HEAD:f > > I'm afraid I'm not going to support that, although it's probably easy > to support hpb:fp..:f (i.e. accept a missing refname but on condition > of having a : in front of the file spec). No, not supporting this form is just fine. >>> + if (defined $input_params{'file_parent'}) { >>> + $input_params{'hash_parent'} ||= git_get_hash_by_path($input_params{'hash_parent_base'}, $input_params{'file_parent'}); >> >> This line is bit long, and I think it should be wrapped.. > > By the way, on the first revision of the path_info patchset, you had me discard > > $hash ||= git_get_hash_by_path($hash_base, $file_name); > > in the simple case on the basis that it was an extra call to external git. > > I actually forgot to remove it from this part of the patchset too at > the time, so this gets me wondering about this: should I put it back > in place in the simple case, or remove it from here too? I think you should remove it here too. IMHO if needed, it should be dealt with (and I think is dealt with) in appropriate action subroutine. -- Jakub Narebski Poland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html