Re: [PATCH] format-patch: autonumber by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Giuseppe Bilotta schrieb:
> Now, about the reason for this patch: I would say that the most common
> use-case of format-patch being used to prepare multiple patches is
> when one plans on sending a patchset. When format.numbering is set to
> auto, single-patches will still be extracted without numbers, but
> patchset will be properly numbered.
> 
> Of course, there may be cases where one doesn't want numbering (for
> which there is the -N flag already), and of course we want to give the
> user the choice to disable autonumbering at the config level, for
> which there is the new noauto option for format.numbering.

I recall that this has been discussed (months or years ago), but I don't
recall whether there was a conclusion or whether the change was dismissed.
Did you research the ML archives?

-- Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux