On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 08:36:37AM -0700, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > I briefly considered a format like this while replying above, but > at prior day-job I used rather long branch names (sometimes with > common prefixes) so it would truncate alot: > > normal case > On i386 abc9056 (i386: Snib the sprock) I don't like this purely for the reason that it wastes horizontal space, which is one of the problems that started this discussion. Also, there is no verb, which I think is worse. :) > *sigh* And I just took up the #@*#@!&!*!@ paintbrush myself. > Dammit. I'm putting it down now. Really. :-) Heh. I don't want to stir up trouble or drag you into a discussion you don't want to be in. But it seems like you are saying "OK, this is silly, let's just go with what is in next." But I think Andreas raised a good point about "stuff the user should check should go on the left" which is not consistent with what is in next. So I just want to confirm that you either disagree with that, or simply think it is not important enough to keep the discussion going. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
