Re: [PATCH 1/3] Prepare for non-interactive merge-preserving rebase

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
Andreas Ericsson <ae@xxxxxx> wrote:
Shawn, I haven't seen this in any of your branches. Overlooked or
dropped? I think 1-2 are probably master material, while I'm not
so sure about 3/3. Would you prefer a re-send that turns it into
a 2-patch series, adding each test with the functionality it tests?

Thanks for the reminder.  It just got lost in the shuffle.  I dragged
them out of the archives and will queue into this morning's update,
so no need for a resend.


Hold off on that if you haven't already applied them. I just noticed
something strange in passing 15 minutes ago that I need to investigate
a bit more. I need to get home now though, so I won't have time to
test it further until later tonight.

--
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux