Re: [PATCH 01/14] Extend index to save more flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/28/08, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So now there is:
>
>  Now CE_EXTENDED_FLAGS & 0x803FFFFF is bad because:
>   * CE_EXTENDED_FLAGS & 0x0000FFFF are saved flags (not extended)
>
>   * CE_EXTENDED_FLAGS & 0x003F0000 are in-memory flags
>
>   * CE_EXTENDED_FLAGS & 0x80000000 is 'extra flags' bit
>     (this is not mentioned in quoted comment; I'm not sure if
>      it needs to be or not)
>
>  Is that correct?

Correct.
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux