Re: [RFC/PATCH] remove vim syntax highlighting in favor of upstream

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 01:53:15PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> [Tim Pope cc'd as the author of the official version. Tim: just an FYI,
> but if you have any comments, please feel free to share]
> 
> [Shawn cc'd as the interim maintainer. I, for one, welcome our
> new Java-programming overlords].
> 
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 07:01:54PM +0200, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> 
> > > Is there any objection to simply removing it (and probably replacing it
> > > with a note to go look at the official highlighting file)?
> > I'm for it, because I didn't know that there is an official git syntax
> > highlight file out there.  Indeed, I haven't even know that vim 7.2 is
> > out.
> 
> Here is a patch, then. Shawn, we should probably give any vim users a
> few days to object in case there is something they don't like about the
> upstream version, but other than that, I think this should be applied to
> master.

As a Vim user, I think removing the syntax file, and giving a
reference to the official one, is fine.

-- 
Garry Dolley
ARP Networks, Inc.
http://scie.nti.st
Los Angeles County REACT, Unit 336
WQGK336

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux