On zo, 2008-09-21 at 16:24 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > The problem is that you can undo the merge content, but not the history > information. So this revert can e.g. propagate even into branches which > still *should* depend on the other branch, you get into trouble when you > want to make your branch depend on the other one anyway, etc. Ah, yes. I see. Does this mean that functionality for easy adding and removing dependencies/patches from a branch can only be provided through some sort of [unpublishable] patch based mechanism like stgit? Possibly we'd need a kind of setup where stgit-like patch branches can be "finalized" into topgit branches. Hmm. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@xxxxxxx> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
