Re: [TopGit PATCH] .gitignore += vim swap files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kirill Smelkov wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 09:10:24AM +0200, Bert Wesarg wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 07:06, Kirill Smelkov <kirr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 03:30:35PM -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Bert Wesarg wrote:

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 18:29, Kirill Smelkov <kirr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 .gitignore |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 8868f2d..aa39db4 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -18,3 +18,5 @@ tg-import.txt
 tg-remote
 tg-remote.txt
 tg
+
+*.swp
can't you do this in your .git/info/excludes?
It's generally better to put a core.excludesfile entry in your
~/.gitconfig pointing to a ignore file with editor temporaries for the
editor(s) you personally use. This will then apply to all git projects you
work on.
Yes, this makes sense, thanks.

I've had to add the following to my ~/.gitconfig

[core]
   excludesfile= /home/kirr/.gitignore-kirr


because it does not work when '~' is used for $HOME

[core]
   excludesfile= ~/.gitignore-kirr # does not work
Have you tried:

  [core]
     excludesfile = .gitignore-kirr
There was a discussion about relative files in config. but I didn't tried this.

It does not work for me -- it picks ./.gitignore-kirr instead of
~/.gitignore-kirr

Anyway, I think this is the best solution. Don't globber the repos with this.

Don't you care more about machines than humans? :)

I think when we work on a tree, all the autogenerated files should be
ignored. This includes *.o and friends for sure, but since we also use
editors, and most people use same editors it makes sense to tune repo to
be ready to hack on with common setups.


Most people do not use same editors. In our office there's 8 programmers
and 6 editors in use (geany, jed, vim, nedit, zend studio, kate).

And I think this

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=7088655477b51a5a248fa54190388e1283ba7ebf

just justifies my words.


If topgit had 4374 contributors since 10 minor versions back, I'd be
more inclined to agree with you. Even so, you'll have to accept that
this patch gets dropped[1] and stop trying to argue for it after it's
already been discussed (at length).

[1]
I'm not too sure who the topgit maintainer actually is, but the majority
seem to be against this patch.

--
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux