Jakub Narebski venit, vidit, dixit 17.09.2008 13:04: > Michael J Gruber <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Martin Langhoff venit, vidit, dixit 17.09.2008 08:40: >>> I just did >>> >>> $ git checkout -b mdl19-offlinetony >>> A README.offline >>> M lib/javascript.php >>> (...) >>> A lib/offline/offlinemoodle.user.js >>> >>> I *like* this "brief status" style - takes me back to my cvs days :-). >>> Perusing the source I found show_local_changes() which in turn led me >>> to trying `git diff --name-status HEAD`. Now, including 'HEAD' in an >>> alias defined in git config is going to lead to trouble... :-/ > [...] >>> I might still make an alias to `git diff --name-status`. This would be >>> a great thing to have as git status "--brief" IMHO... :-) >> git status also shows untracked files. I don't know how to tell diff to >> show untracked files as well. --diff-filter=X doesn't do it. > > git-ls-files? Yes, "git ls-files -t -d -m -o --directory" does something like "otherscmyouknowwho status". But it's plumbing, and the most obvious porcelain place for such functionality is "git status", followed by "git diff". I do understand that "git status" is mostly "git commit --dry-run". But shouldn't we have something like Martin suggested readily available (including, optionally, untracked or ignored files). Michael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
