Re: Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 5 - other SCM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 14 Sep 2008, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:

On 9/12/08, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 15) Do you miss features in git that you know from other SCMs?
    If yes, what features are these (and from which SCM)?
    (Open ended text - Essay)

 Total respondents       1046 (some/many of them wrote 'no')
 skipped this question   1249

 This is just a very quick summary, based on a first few pages of
 responses, Full analysis is I think best left for after closing the
 survey, because I think this would be a lot of work...

 So here is preliminary list, or rather beginning of one:
  * sparse/partial checkout and clone (e.g. Perforce)

Have not read the survey result, but do you recall what is the most
used term for sparse/partial checkout? What SCMs do sparse/partial
checkout? I think it could be usable as it is now in my
will-be-sent-again series, but I don't really know how people want it
to from that.

the most common use-case is people who want to follow a project but (at least think that they) don't need the history. so they want to save time/bandwideth/disk space by not downloading things they don't need.

David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux