Re: What's in git.git (Sep 2008, #02; Wed, 10)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael J Gruber <michaeljgruber+gmane@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I think the cleanest approach would consist in introducing another
> linkgit macro (for everything linkgit:git-) which ouputs dashed resp.
> dashless forms for docbook (i.e. man) resp. html targets. I'll cook up a
> POC if noone keeps me from doing so ;)

I personally think the links are Ok to be left as they are in git-foo form
but if there is a good way to persuade manual viewers to display "git foo"
and still follow "man git-foo", that would be great.

Names of the programs in "git-foo" form in the plain text, unless they are
the server side programs, should be updated to say "git foo"
(cf. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/95436/focus=95443)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux