You don't need to smudge the OOo file on checkout iff OOo can read a file
that is "compressed" at level 0.
I will check again then, since my first attempt at this was not very
successful and I think I was getting dirty files even cleaning only.
But it was a long time ago right after clean was introduced.
But in any case it would be preferable to smudge on checkout since
uncompressed OO files can be quite huge.
Also to have uncompressed OO files in the worktree means that if you
ever need to send one as an attachment to somebody you need to reopen
and resave it before making the attachment, which is a bit uncomfortable!
A file that you have just 'git add'ed must not show up as dirty even if it
was processed by a "clean" filter. If it does, then this indicates a bug
in git, and not that a corresponding "smudge" filter is missing or
misbehaves. Yes, I have observed this with my own "clean" filter some time
ago, but I have not yet tried hard enough to find a reproducible test case.
But am I correct in saying that it will show dirty if you clean and then
smudge in a non symmetric way?
Sergio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html