Re: Gitk and --no-walk don't play together

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Monday 2008-09-08 12:34, Santi Bejar wrote:
>>
>>> in an attempt to only show only the tags in the graph, gitk barfs:
>>
>>Use the "List references" in the file menu.
>
> Nope, the intention was to have gitk display something like
>
> * Linux 2.6.26
> |
> * Linux 2.6.25
>
> without any intermediate commits.
>

I think the only option is to generate a graft file specifying 2.6.25
as parent  of 2.6.26.

I have an script that generates it. It gives an overview of the
branches/tags, where the parents of a branch/tag are the independent
branches/tags that are antecesors (search for git-overview in the
list). But currently it has a very bad performance, it could be added
to git itself like the other history simplifications, but I don´t
know.

Santi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux