Anders Melchiorsen <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Using "git checkout" to undo local changes is a hint that is often > given in #git. This patch (part 2) adds the hint into the status > output. A bit of restructuring appears in the initial patch. > > This is merely an RFC, I am not sure whether I like it myself :-). While I think the patch means well, I personally think that the output is already too chatty with these "friendly hints" about add/rm/reset. After this series, will we be adding 'use "git checkout HEAD -- <path>" to go back to the state of the latest commit', and then "if you want to stage only part of the change, use "git add -i <path>"? "To temporarily remove the change use "git stash"? I would agree that "hint is often given in #git" is an indication that people do not know "git checkout" to check out the path from the index to get rid of the change. I further suspect that "I modified my file and git status says 'Changed but not updated'; what should I do" may not be asked often anymore, which might owe the hint we have in status output. Even then, I do not necessarily agree that the status output (yes, I am also questioning the existing hints as well) is the best place to teach these people. The approach would lead to insanely long output that reproduces the user manual, and we should draw the line somewhere. As I said, I suspect that what we say is already too chatty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
