Re: Are more and more patches getting lost lately?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Imran M Yousuf" <imyousuf@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I actually liked the following 2 patch and since it was Junio I did
> not think support was required :-D.
> ...
>> From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [PATCH/RFC] feeding Maildir to git-am
>> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:25:57 -0700
>> Message-ID: <7vbpzotfyy.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/92963
>>
>> From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re* [PATCH] git-apply - Add --include=PATH
>> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 01:05:31 -0700
>> Message-ID: <7vhc99h644.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/93604

I think for most of these patches, and other patches from me of the same
nature, I tried to make it clear that the patches were primarily to
illustrate possibly better solutions, and I do not consider them finished
solutions.

The quality of these patches from me do not meet my patch acceptance
criteria.

More importantly I wasn't the one with the itch.  Onus of testing them,
polishing them as necessary and providing documentation into the final
applicable patch lie on the original requestors' shoulders.

Especially when I am busy.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux