On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 12:23:50AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > I started on a patch, but frankly, I hate it. Adding such a filtering to > git-status is quite invasive, while I believe that it's simply not worth > it - I have yet to encounter a situation with git when simply looking at > either git diff or plain git status is impractical to check which files > need to be merged yet, so I don't want to expend energy on a patch which > is going to be ugly and useless by my belief. > > If you do insist that we need this functionality, can you please just > drop the git ls-files bit from the patch, or should I resend it? It just occured to me - what about git diff --diff-filter=U [--name-status] or is that too long? (The universal answer being, "you can alias it". ;-) Petr "Pasky" Baudis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
