Re: [PATCH v2] for-each-ref: `:short` format for `refname`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Tries to shorten the refname to a non-ambiguous name.
> I.e. the full and the short refname points to the same object.

The definition of "ambiguity" here is wrong (see below).

> +	/* skip first rule, will always match */
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_rules - 1; i++) {
> +		const char **p;
> +		int short_name_len;
> +
> +		if (1 != sscanf(ref->refname, scanf_fmts[nr_rules - 1 - i],
> +				short_name))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		short_name_len = strlen(short_name);
> +
> +		/* check if full and short point to the same object

Style?

> +		 * by checking all rules in forward direction
> +		 */

I think this part of the code is wrong, in that it talks about what object
the ref points at.  That is not what ref ambiguity is about.

Given a tag that points at a version 1.0.0 commit, this sequence will
create:

	$ git tag foo v1.0.0^0
        $ git branch foo v1.0.0^0

ambiguous branch and tag whose names are both 'foo', even though they
point at the same thing.  The right API to use would be resolve_ref(), I
think.

Other than that, it is well done.

Although I was initially a bit surprised by the size of the patch to
implement something so (conceptually) simple, the code was easy and
straightforward to follow.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux