Re: [PATCH 0/2] Move call_depth and index_only to struct merge_options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 01:02:31PM -0700, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I found it a bit disturbing that "index_only" and "call_depth" were
>> not
>> part of merge_options structure.
>
> Here are two patches to do it, on top of current mv/merge-recursive.

I suspected that it always holds that "index_only === !!call_depth".

Shouldn't strbuf obuf be part of the merge_options structure that
describes the current call status?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux