Re: [PATCH v2] Improve portability: Cast pid_t's to intmax_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"George Spelvin" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> You can be paranoid if you like and cast to long, but I don't think
> even a massive 64-bit cluster is likely to have more than 2G processes
> in the forseeable future.

But it isn't it possible for some OS to use a sparse PID namespace?

-Miles

-- 
Brain, n. An apparatus with which we think we think.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux