Hi,
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Jay Soffian" <jaysoffian@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > I understand why "git reset" failed, but at best the error message is
> > confusing to a new user.
>
> This is in "patches welcome" category.
<noise>
I sometimes wondered if "git init" should create a dummy commit
with empty tree, empty commit message or something like that and
set refs/heads/master to that and HEAD to master.
But I always said to myself that this is a stupid idea for several
reasons, i.e. backwards compatibility, or: if the dummy commit is to
be ignored (i.e. will not become parent of the first commit),
then it does not really help at all in decreasing complexity.
So I rejected this thought, but now it came back. ;-)
A backwards-compatibily-breaking dummy commit would also help
rebasing onto the dummy (replacing the first real commit).
But I still think it's stupid.
</noise>
So, for a patch, is it sane to just remove/clear the index
if get_sha1("HEAD", sha1) fails?
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@xxxxxxx>, PGP 0x6EDDD207FCC5040F
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
