On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > > > Unless/until we have an easy way to obtain the information "git-ls-files > > > -u" gives during conflict resolution, ls-files should stay on the list of > > > commonly used commands. > > > > Doesn't "git status" tell you that? Or do you want the extra info from the > > implicit --stage? > > I think he doesn't want to see the other files that are already > merged successfully. git status shows them, git ls-files -u > does not. I think it might make sense to support "git status --unmerged" or something like that, where it filters the output by the tags it would show. -Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank* -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
