On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, david@xxxxxxx wrote: > and for cloneing (and especially thing like linux-next where you essentially > re-clone daily) letting the pack get cached is probably a very good thing. I hope that people recloning linux-next daily are very few. This is an incredible waste of bandwidth, regardless of the protocol used, dumb or not. A standard fetch with a remote tracking branch (with -f or with a plus sign on the "fetch" line in your config file) should be all that's needed to significantly reduce the amount of data needed to transfer. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
