A Large Angry SCM wrote:
Jean Delvare wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:58:37 -0400, A Large Angry SCM wrote:
David Woodhouse wrote:
(C) Just don't do it. Leave the git-foo commands as they were. They
weren't actually hurting anyone, and you don't actually _gain_
anything by removing them. For those occasional nutters who
_really_ care about the size of /usr/bin, give them the _option_
of a 'make install' without installing the aliases.
Acked-by: A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@xxxxxxxxx>
[...]
Do some research; [...]
...the plan to move git-foo out of /usr/bin has been discussed and
wrapped up quite a while ago (am I confident to say without being
subscriber of git@xxxxxx'org myself).
Instead of unhelpful complaints after the fact, you could try which of
the many available alternatives work for you: Extended PATH, shell
aliases, command line completion setup, links in ~/bin, or so many other
possibilities of varying degree of sophistication. If none of these fix
whatever issues you experience, there is surely opportunity to discuss
details on the git list.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- =--- ==-=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
