Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 05:30:54PM -0700, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Heh, if we are to do the attention-getter, let's do so more strongly ;-) > > Does this include removing of --work-tree as well? > > The git backend of Pootle (http://translate.sourceforge.net/wiki/) uses > it. Interesting. Does it use it because it can (meaning, --work-tree is supposed to work), or because --work-tree is the cleanest way to do what it wants to do (if the feature worked properly, that is, which is not the case)? > Also, here is a question: > > $ git --git-dir git/.git --work-tree git diff --stat|tail -n 1 > 1443 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 299668 deletions(-) > > So, it's like it thinks every file is removed. > > But then: > > $ cd git > $ git diff --stat|wc -l > 0 > > is this a bug, or a user error? I think it is among the many other things that falls into "the two attempts still haven't resolved" category. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
