Hi, On Sat, 23 Aug 2008, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 3:03 AM, Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Please read aloud the following commands: > >> git log --pretty=short > >> git log --pretty=full > >> git log --pretty=format:%s > >> > >> It is just me or 'pretty full' doesn't exactly convey the meaning of > >> the action to execute? > > > > But "pretty short" and "pretty format" is. :) > > > >> How about: > >> git log --format=short > >> git log --format=full > >> git log --format=custom:%s > >> > >> If you like the idea I can work on a patch. > > > > Because --pretty=<format> is an option taken by many git commands > > including git plumbing (e.g. rev-list), many scripts will rely on > > "--pretty" and they all would have to be changed. And --pretty exists > > since Jan 2005 (see 9d97aa64). > > Well, it might be difficult, but that doesn't mean it should not be > done. Just like the 'git-*' removal, there could be a period for > transition. Of course it could be done. But I do not deem it necessary. In the balance gain/pain it comes out as not worth the hassle on this guy's calculator. Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
