Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:24:52AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >> Exactly. Don't rebase. And don't base your development on somebody who 
> >> does.
> > 
> > That's pretty much impossible in the current state of Linux development
> > as far as I know.
> > 
> >> Remember how I told you that you should never rebase?
> > 
> > I suspect your recommendation does not match real world git use.
> 
> I think if you have to rebase often, you're actually better off using

[ ] You read my original email.

The issue is not that I'm rebasing [1], but that other people I'm updating
trees from are rebasing all the time. And Linus and the others can
say "don't rebase" all the time -- that doesn't change the fact thato
others are rebasing anyways. And git's support for dealing with that seems
to be quite poor.

-Andi

[1] Ok I do it occasionally, but that's not the problem here, and
I don't have a real user base for my trees and the branches I'm 
doing that on.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux