On 8/22/08, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 01:56:39PM -0400, Avery Pennarun wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > But I presume that's a reasonable common usage. Would it
>> > make sense to have some standard git sub command that does that?
>> > ("get latest state of remote branch, doing what it takes to get it")
>> > Or is there already one that I missed?
>>
>> Isn't that just
>>
>> git fetch somewhere branchname
>> git reset --hard FETCH_HEAD
>>
>> ?
>
> My script right now does.
>
> git fetch origin
> git fetch --tags origin
> git remote update
> git checkout master
> git reset --hard origin/master
>
why the two fetch?
isn't git remote update sufficient?
ciao,
--
Paolo
http://paolo.ciarrocchi.googlepages.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
