Re: Bug/problem with 1.6.0 on UnixWare

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2008/8/21 Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 03:38:32PM +0100, Mike Ralphson wrote:
>
>> Great stuff. Though I think it might provoke some patches to improve
>> the display of multiple long tag names for the same commit in gitweb!
>
> Heh. Can you pass along the final version of your build script? I want
> to make sure we are doing the same things.

http://repo.or.cz/w/git/gitbuild.git?a=blob;f=gitbuild.sh;h=d06fbef3c7aa54ea3beab4b3eed4d73387f3b136;hb=2da51f87b94ef564691a656f91b97472bf6d8c53

The setting of the PATH and GIT_SKIP_TESTS are obviously env. specific.

At the moment there's still a bit of manual faffing around when next
is rewound after a release.

> Yes, in theory, last minute code changes could cause a portability
> breakage. However, any changes from the last -rc to the release version
> tend to be extremely conservative (as judged by Junio), so in practice
> I don't think it happens. For example, I think this git-shell bug made
> it into master over a month before release.

True, this instance isn't a last minute breakage.

Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux