Re: [PATCH 2/2] allow '%d' pretty format specifier to show decoration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Jeff King wrote:
>
>> There is a lot of room for discussion here.
>
> Indeed.  When I posted a similar patch, there was some discussion, too.  
> But no resolution, as it seemed nobody was really interested.

Why being so negative?  Got up on the wrong side of the bed?

People drop off of a discussion for different reasons, and it is not
necessarily from total lack of interest (unless nobody responded to the
initial call-for-discussion, obviously).  Perhaps there were more
interesting and/or pressing thing for them to think about than interaction
between decorate and pretty=format at the same time.

This time around, the original requestor may be more motivated and/or have
time for this topic than you were motivated and/or you had time back then,
and can carry the discussion forward.  Let's see what happens.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux