"Peter Valdemar Mørch (Lists)" <4ux6as402@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Here, here! That is *exactly* what I was thinking when I started > reading this thread: "Hey, the "git diff" stuff was easy enough, it > was the reverting (and friends) that caused me trouble!" > > Also, in the same area, I've now understood that to undo a "git add" - > to remove a change from the index and making it show up as a > difference between the working tree and the index - one can use "git > ... Would've been helpful to me to have a > sentense or paragraph about that in git-add.txt,... Wonderful. Can somebody who is relatively (but not extremely) new to git can volunteer to be a documentation secretary to collect these "Hear, hear, it would have been very helpful if X were documented next to Y" stories, and coordinate documentation updates after enough such improvement suggestions are collected? People who lost git virginity like myself cannot do this sensibly and fairly. For example, as my mind is already contaminated enough that I discarded the original "add this as Discussion item to revert" message after reading it once, judging it to add extra noise without much merit. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
