On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Jan Hudec <bulb@xxxxxx> wrote: > > I've already done the later (have patch series ready), but I am now thinking > that I should probably redo it the first way. What do you think. Does it make > sense to do that? > Could you please post somewhere the patches ? Better yet to fork from http://repo.or.cz/w/qgit4.git and set up your tree on http://repo.or.cz/ host (it's easy and fast, thanks Peter :-) I can check that and eventually pulling from that. As a general rule if you have already done a good chunk of work with unit test patches I would avoid to ask you to redo in a different way, so I would say it does not make a lot of sense to me at least before looking at the code. Marco P.S: I have played a bit with qmake some time ago (to set-up the double build environment Windows/Linux) so perhaps I could help you in finding some useful trick to avoid the cons regarding .pro files you posted. But of course I first need to see the patches. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
