On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 12:21:24AM -0400, Marcus Griep wrote:
> +void human_readable_size(char *buf, int buf_size, double size /* in bytes */)
> +{
> + char human_readable_prefixes[10] = "BKMGTPEZY";
> + if (buf_size < 5)
> + die("insufficient buffer size");
> + int i = 0;
> + for (; i < 8 && size >= 1000 ; ++i, size = size / 1024)
> + ;
> + if (size >= 1000)
> + die("size greater than 999Y");
> + sprintf(buf, "%.*f%c",
> + size < 10 ? 1 : 0,
> + size,
> + human_readable_prefixes[i]
> + );
> +}
Are you aware of progress.c:throughput_string()? It would make sense to
use the same code in both instances.
I'd prefer you to keep using binary units instead of the ambiguous
prefixes, since we should keep our output consistent and I believe they
usually end up to be the least confusing choice. (Otherwise, don't you
want to use "bkM" instead of "BKM"? I never really know.)
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
The next generation of interesting software will be done
on the Macintosh, not the IBM PC. -- Bill Gates
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
